SSE
DON JUAJTOVO)
TWI
roune vull vidë prognol
.Y. JU
COPY.
KANCI ni I .off
No. 5119/1911.
Sir,
No. 24.
423
Government House,
Hongkong, 3rd.September, 1912.
To - igang ni Jhauput she of earstofur MI ́
-5 dyeƐ Jual to „from sud to LINOVOBNE .oli nattel e' punol[eurâ zwoY
4
**
d clean sok vacand ma to reis..rd To Rua Tutul si & Jerið rod-
-Juo live aloijuoup 190jo ond to JuneInte¤ env gnillaq beteIquico brezrok od moron mid eva: I,sived snuo.. od brigjen dobu
sunsah slu. Decoq uq osis likim refund to SATURIONEL JIMI fsite 191
-ad bariumo resú er sno Jud sanio cani cut ini ber ni bədxam
es Iliv sen ̧it vogelais où desidue eu lliw noidy Jarn s.¢ 9"UBO-
-diondos egoit où Iliv naiq siff Jonsis6qje odvuy92 3 1701 91.860 NOL
sitivomull peolus I molli,JI\GOJIJOS sci kha vyuo blu enc
03 be-
.comoreley To esretnevnoо Tot
.3
-olleɔzł wol rencah? manol os baly od I leda I
,535 eval I
.babneur as strib ad ni erjones yo-
PROM AE (6)
• ... IN, "TUINI9VO Į
ponafloorú 81H
• Â Lọ 1901°40 Liwe ent
With reference to correspondence ending with the Colonial Secretary's letter of the 29th. of April addressed to the Chief Engineer, South China Command, and particularly to Sir F. Lugard's letter of the 16th. of September, 1911, I have the honour to refer you to my letter of the 9th. of December, 1907, and to Colonel Darling's reply of the 13th. December in the same year. In the latter letter the view is accepted that no part of the land taken up for Mount Davis Battery should be regarded as a Military Reserve.
2. It is the fact that in Sir F. Lugard's letter of the 16th. of September, 1911, it was indicated that the whole area over which the Military Authorities wish to have clearance rights re- -cognised in connection with this battery, would be brought under the designation of "Military Reserves". But I regret that I do not share Sir F. Luagard's view. Ky view is expressed in the letter of the 9th. December, 1907. It is confirmed by the procedure followed in the purchase outright by the War Department of the whole of the land required for and around Pinewood Battery. I submit that except in the particular cases provided for in the Lewis Agreement in order to settle outstanding questions Military reserves cannot exist
3. I recognise however that in certain cases like that of the Mount Davis Battery clearance rights over a defined area may be necessary and if my views as to the abolition of future Military Reserves is acepted I am quite willing to recommend to the Secretary of State that in such cases the Colonial Government will undertake to insert in the Conditions of any land leased for building purposef that neither the Colonial Government nor the Military Authorities shall be responsible for payment of compensation in the event of such buildings being injured by gun fire in the event of actual
hostilities.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.